FILE 02 // EST. 1848 // STATUS: SOURCE CODE — ALL LATER FILES ARE FORKS
Historical materialism, surplus value, class struggle: the operating system every other school in this archive runs on, argues with, or claims to have patched.
Karl Marx arrived at communism sideways: a Rhineland doctor's son, trained in Hegelian philosophy, radicalized by editing a newspaper the Prussian censors kept shutting down. Exiled to Paris in 1843, he met Friedrich Engels — a Manchester mill-owner's son who had just written the definitive exposé of English working-class misery. The partnership was asymmetric and permanent: Marx wrote the system; Engels funded it, popularized it, and finished it after Marx's death.
Their move was to fuse three national traditions into one machine. From German philosophy they took Hegel's dialectic — history advances through contradiction — and stood it "on its feet": the motor of history is not Spirit but material production. From English political economy they took Ricardo's labour theory of value and turned it against its owners. From French politics they took the revolution itself, and its most radical conclusion: Babeuf's demand that equality be made real in property, not just law.
In February 1848, weeks before revolutions detonated across Europe, the Communist League published their commissioned program. The Communist Manifesto opens with a séance — "a spectre is haunting Europe" — and closes with a threat the twentieth century took literally: the proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains.
The way a society produces its material life — who owns the tools, who does the work — determines its politics, law and ideas. History is the sequence of these "modes of production": slavery, feudalism, capitalism, and next, allegedly, socialism. "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles."
The core accusation of Capital (1867). Workers are paid for their labour-power, but produce more value than that wage; the difference — surplus value — is the source of all profit. Exploitation is therefore not a moral failure of bad capitalists but the definition of the wage relation itself.
Capitalism simplifies society into two great camps: bourgeoisie (owners of the means of production) and proletariat (owners of nothing but labour-power). Their interests are irreconcilable; the struggle between them is the engine that will end the system.
Competition forces capital to concentrate, mechanize and periodically crash. Each crisis is larger; each round proletarianizes more of society. Capitalism thus "produces its own gravediggers" — collapse is tendential, not accidental.
Between capitalism and communism lies a transition in which the working class holds state power and expropriates the expropriators. Marx left the details fatally vague — two sentences in the Critique of the Gotha Programme onto which every later school projected its own state, or its absence.
The end state: classless, stateless, moneyless; production for use, not exchange. "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." Marx wrote perhaps ten pages on it in forty years — the sparsest blueprint ever fought over this hard.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."— MARX, THESES ON FEUERBACH (1845)
Marx's own political practice was the First International (1864–1876) — a fractious coalition of Marxists, anarchists and trade unionists that he steered, dominated and ultimately broke rather than surrender to Bakunin. The Paris Commune of 1871 gave him his one glimpse of the proletariat in power: seventy-two days of elected, recallable, workers'-wage government, drowned in blood. His verdict in The Civil War in France — the working class cannot simply lay hold of the ready-made state machinery — became scripture for every later school, each reading it differently.
Marx died in 1883 stateless, two volumes of Capital unfinished on his desk. He never governed anything, which is precisely why every school that did governs in his name: the source code ships without an implementation, and the forks have been fighting over the build ever since.
Every file in this archive is a reading of this one. The orthodox waited for the science to complete itself; Lenin built a party to force the timetable; Luxemburg trusted the masses; the Western Marxists took the analysis into culture; the anarchists kept the goal and burned the transitional state. Beyond the movement, Marx's diagnostic half — crisis theory, class analysis, the critique of ideology — was absorbed into the social sciences wholesale. The prescription remains, to put it gently, contested.
The source documents and the year they were written into. February 1848 put the pamphlet in print; by June the barricades were up across Europe, and neither event caused the other.
Plates are vendored from Wikimedia Commons under their own licences and re-encoded to web size; the credit for each is listed in the Plate Room.